General Information about Medical Malpractice

Medical Malpractice occurs when a physician fails to properly treat a medical condition and the negligent act or omission is the cause of additional or aggravated injury to the patient.  Obviously the physician cannot be responsible for the original underlying medical problem. This negligence could cause a case against the doctor if his/her actions differ from generally accepted standards of practice, or it may be against the hospital for improper care. These include problems with nursing care, medications or sanitation. Local, state and/or federal agencies, which  operate such hospital facilities, may also be held liable.

Medical malpractice laws are designed to protect a patients’ rights to seek compensation if they are injured due to negligence.  Medical malpractice cases are by their very nature, complex, expensive to pursue and have a high risk of no recovery.  If you believe you have a medical malpractice claim, it is essential to seek advice from our experienced medical malpractice  attorney who may assist in determining the validity of your claim and the details that need to be proven to see if it is worth pursuing.

Variations in Medical Malpractice Cases

Negligence of Physicians, Hospitals and Others

The negligence in medical malpractice cases may occur in a variety of situations including but not limited to a delay or failure in diagnosing a disease;  injury to the patient; a health care professional’s deviation from the applicable standard of care; a health care professional who has made the correct diagnosis, may thereafter commit medical malpractice by failing to properly treat the disease or injury.
Several criteria must be established to prove medical malpractice.  First and foremost is establishing the standard of care the health care professional should have provided. Some errors in judgment may result in additional injury to a patient, yet not all medical errors are understood to be negligible.

To be legally at fault, the patient must be able to prove that the health care provider’s actions fell below the standard of medical care established.  Expert testimony to confirm the standard required relating to the patient and the professional failed to work within the established standard.  In rare cases, expert testimony is not required when it is obvious to the average person that the standard was violated. 

Expert witnesses must be qualified by the Court, based on the prospective experts qualifications and the standards set from legal precedent.  To be qualified as an expert in a medical malpractice case, a person must have a sufficient knowledge, education, training or experience regarding the specific issue before the court to qualify the expert to give a reliable opinion on a relevant issue.  The qualifications of the expert are not the deciding factors as to whether the individual will be qualified, although they are certainly important considerations.  Expert testimony is not qualified “just because somebody with a diploma says it is so” (United States v. Ingham, 42 M.J. 218, 226 [A.C.M.R. 1995]).

It is possible that the cause of the injury may not be established, but the injury could not have occurred unless there was medical negligence.  A legal doctrine known as res ipsa loquitur, permits a jury to infer the health care professional’s negligent conduct in these types of medical malpractice.  Additional items must also be proven such as the doctor and physician relationship, the action or lack of action that was the source of the medical malpractice, or the “causation” is also an essential factor.

DISCLAIMER: The information you obtain at our firm web site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. It is recommended that you should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

Copyright © MMVII JAKOBIE